I fortunately have a city-state ally smack dab in the middle east so I got to see his entire campaign there unfold. In terms of force concentration, I saw Napoleon and Bismark being ok with this, and Otto totally took advantage of embarking to achieve an objective. Wars occured between siam china and france which is why I mentioned them because they all had big territories and armies until Germany and I conquered them, effectively splitting the map between us. Build 4-5 cities, get to the modern era and steam roll the incapable AI.Ĭlick to expand.So far, Germany, China, Siam, and France have all seemed competent on the war side for me, especially germany, his i'm in a game right now on the earth map and he literally control africa, europe, and bit of the middle-east and his military is just insanely huge. In the end I think it was fun playing always war but in the future I will just go back to civ IV style play. For some reason though the AI fails to consider that just because they have 100 units that doesn't mean much to a civ that has mech inf and tanks. He had about 15 cities and culurally filled them all so there was no break in his landmass. There were so many units on the Ottoman territory that I could hardly move, some turns I had to just hit spacebar and wait for a spot to open. The problem is two AI who managed to get a large empire were crushed under their own weight.
From the barbs straight to a city state to my unlucky neighbors to stupid Ottomans thinking they had a chance. In CiV I was pretty much at war for 80% of the game.
I can play a game in 2-3 hours at Immortal. Building my infrastructure and getting as many hammers/pop as I can then going to war with rifles if it is a close game or waiting for tanks because it is faster and I am lazy. Typically I play Civ IV by getting my core cities and maybe an early war.
0 kommentar(er)
